Monday, September 2, 2013

A summer with no to-do list

I realized that it's been awhile since I did a to-do list. And then I checked my online to-do list and realized that it's been two months to the day. 

This is not like me. I have always been an obsessive list-maker. Shopping lists, to do lists, bills to pay, bucket lists - it's who I am. How on earth can I get anything done without one?

Well, I didn't really get much done. In part because the wrist tendonitis that plagued me from mid-April to early August, and was especially bad after the move was completed, didn't allow me to do very much. I couldn't really do any yard work, I couldn't do a lot of unpacking and organizing (crumpling up paper hurt), and it even hurt to write.

And I didn't really have that much to do - I had two students at Howard Community College, both on Wednesdays. They were pretty low-maintenance, so it wasn't like I had to do a lot of prep work.
I did a lot of traveling - I went to New York three out of the five weekends of June; the first weekend, up to Manhattan to see my dear friend Sorab Wadia on his closing weekend of Bunty Berman Presents off-Broadway and to see my I-wish-he-were-my-dear-friend Alan Cumming in his tour de force performance of Macbeth on Broadway. The second and third weekends of June I spent in Baltimore, enjoying the weirdness that is HonFest in Hampden on the 8th and spending my birthday (the 15th) with my BFF Carrie Widegren at the Penn-Mar Irish Festival (skip it) and just hanging out.

The following weekend Bill and I celebrated our tenth anniversary in the Finger Lakes in upstate New York, where we'd spent our honeymoon. We stayed in the same B&B and in the same room and drank some of the same wines - which we didn't like as much as we did ten years ago. Our palates have changed, I guess.

And then the final weekend of June, I went up to NYC on my own and saw my wonderful friend/former student/cabaret partner/studio pianist Ryan Cappleman and other friends in the off-Broadway production of Waiting: A Song Cycle

I felt really unproductive this summer, but I wasn't, all told. I just wasn't obsessing over everything that needed to be done. I think I needed that time to collect my energies to prepare for my new life. 

And now that I'm here - the house is sold, I have a job, and I have a studio to market - I'll be returning to my list-making ways, but hopefully allowing enough time for spontaneity and life to creep in.



Sunday, August 4, 2013

Chrissie has REALLY left the building (for good)

Last weekend I was back in Milwaukee, emptying out the house, which is now occupied by the new owners. Technically, we still own the house - they're renting from us till closing.

While I was there, I got to see a couple of performances (my husband said, "Are you there to bring stuff back or are you just going to see shows?" I said, "Both").

Friday: Oliver! at UW-Waukesha, choreographed by and starring the wonderful Ryan Cappleman. I don't really like the show, or at least, I haven't liked the show in the past. Ryan did a great job choreographing the show and he was a fantastic Fagin. His "Reviewing the Situation" had so many layers I hadn't thought of. His characterization was really unique - I saw a bit of Gollum in it (in a good way). It was a great show, overall (although I still think that Bill Sykes is a character that has no redeeming qualities and I don't understand why everyone puts up with his crap).

Saturday: Les Miserables, Greendale Community Theater. This was a revelation. I've only seen Les Mis done by high schools (MUHS, Tosa East & Pius) and the movie. I wasn't sure what the full show was actually like. This was an amazing and wholly professional production that I think Skylight is going to have to live up to when they do it in the fall. Studio representation included Lissa DeGuzman as Eponine, who was lovely. She sang and portrayed the role beautifully - flirtatious, noble, heartbreaking and courageous. Kat Geertsen was also a terrific addition to the ensemble. Friends of mine in the production were the fabulous Doug Clemons as Enjoiras, Robby McGhee as Thenardier, and Mara McGhee in the ensemble. I would've gladly seen the show again before I left and I kind of wish I did because on -

Sunday: I saw Don Giovanni, presented by East Side Chamber Players in the Pius XI HS Black Box Theater.

The DG was good, as was the Leporello. All the other singers sang pretty well. But -

I wish I'd seen Les Mis a second time instead. Although DG was free. Free is good.

And on Monday, I cleaned up, packed up and took myself out to dinner at Café Hollander to use their free WiFi.

Tuesday - got up early, went for a run and then loaded up the poor damaged MINI and hit the road. And 15.5 hours later (!!!), I arrived at home (there was a lot of construction).

I miss all my students terribly. And I hope you will all keep in touch. I may come back to town time to time and give a workshop or two. If I do, I will let you know. Please keep following the studio page and my blog to see what words of wisdom and silliness I have to impart. :D

Saturday, July 27, 2013

I will survive (I did survive)....

Once I was afraid, I was petrified....

And that once was this past Thursday at about 3:10pm EDT, somewhere in Indiana. As I was traveling westbound on I70, I suddenly became aware of a red and white panel looming at my driver's side. It was a CVS truck who was changing lanes on top of my MINI Cooper. I honked... I think. I might just have screamed obscenities, I'm not sure which. Whatever it was, it caught the driver's attention in time for him to avoid crushing me, but he did make contact with my driver's side door, and more seriously, caught his wheel into my wheel well, tore off the cover, and left a big wheel imprint on my car with a HOLE in the body.

I'm okay. I managed to get control of my car and not hit the guardrail or go over the bridge. I didn't start crying till later, when traffic went down to one lane and I was crawling along at 3 miles per hour with a semi in front and in back. Then I got hysterical. And fortunately, the driver behind me saw that and backed off.

It was a very bad day.  I’ve heard of “wait for the bus,” but this is ridiculous. (Somatic Voicework™the LoVetri Method inside joke)

But I, remarkably, survived. And will live to sing another day, and teach another day, and be grateful another day.

And I hope all you find something or someone to be grateful for.




Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Seminar Summary and Doing Better

Yesterday I attended Jeannie LoVetri's seminar. It was the closing event at the 2013 Contemporary Commercial Music Institute Somatic Voicework™ the LoVetri Method program at Shenandoah University in Winchester, Virginia.

Since I am certified in all 3 levels of the program, I attended a post-certification program on Speaking and Singing with the Same Voice, taught by Joan Melton. I've already discussed how wonderful this was. I had not attended Jeannie's seminar before, and decided to do it this year - honestly, for political/networking reasons. And as the final day of the post-certification program ended, I was pretty much ready to go home and was regretting having signed up for another day's work.

The seminar's direction was decided by each participant. Jeannie asked, "What do you want to know?" and we all made our requests. Some people wanted to be warmed up by Jeannie, some wanted to discuss working on the high belt mix, some wanted to know how much chest was too much, one person wanted to know how to teach a rock scream, and I wanted to see SVW™ principles implemented with male voices. We did all these things, and I gained tons from it.

But we started out with a brief lecture by Jeannie and this is what I took away from it (somewhat paraphrased):

Like 12-step, it’s one day at a time. There are some days that you don’t do it (practice, sing, exercise, stay sober/straight), and you acknowledge that you didn’t do it and you try to do better. It’s a reflection on the state of your life, not your voice. You don’t have a bad voice - you’re just not working on it. 
So I acknowledge that after about 2 months of eating pretty healthfully and staying away from fast food, I didn't do it last night (curse you, Wendy's). And I will try to do better.

And my house and studio are not fully functional yet. I acknowledge that I have to spend some time in getting it to where it needs to be so that I can teach here in the fall. And I will try to do better.

And I have a beautiful voice and I haven't been working on it. And I will try to do better.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjdipLGUl00

Monday, July 22, 2013

Day 3 - It was a SCREAM! (Quite literally)

  • Session III Techniques for extended voice use, phrasing for speaking and
    singing, and opportunities for individual performance coaching
In the morning, we started out with yoga poses and making sounds. It was terrific. Then we spent some time laughing, crying, calling and screaming. All of which were done to find the physical response to the different sounds and to find healthy ways to do things that you have to do on stage when you need to. There's not always time to go into Method Acting to conjure up the right mood for a good laugh, a good cry, or screaming your brains out. You have to know how to do it when the director asks for it and when the role calls for it. And be able to repeat it as needed.

In the afternoon, we discussed the prior day's master class with Broadway music director David Chase. Joan gave us a comprehensive list of things we (and our students) need to know:

Rules for auditions:
  1. Be not only on time, but a little ahead of time. CALL if you’ll even be two minutes late! Respect one another’s time. The theater is a team. Communication and promptness is essential.
  2. Never go into a rehearsal (or any official activity) with gum in your mouth. 
  3. The way you take notes is important. Don’t make excuses. Take responsibility.
  4. Respect the articulation required for different styles. Musical theater requires greater attention to consonants. 
  5. Do your research - who is your character singing to? Where is he/she from?
  6. Be easy to get along with.
  7. The decision is often made within the first 30 seconds of entering the room BEFORE YOU EVEN SING. How you enter the room, look at the pianist, look at the panel, relate to the pianist... you can blow it before you even sing.
  8. How you react to suggestions in an audition plays a large part in whether or not you will get cast.
  9. Have your slate prepared: “I am X and I’ll be singing Y.” Be flexible enough to go with the format established by the house/panel for whom you are singing.

Comments

  1. Gestures - they must seem organic and natural (again, depending on the style - there may be some stylistic stock gestures). Some people had the same gesture happening over and over and over.... and it meant nothing.
  2. Movement should not be done for its own stake. Emotion is a response to action. 
  3. Tell a story. An actor needs to want something. What do you want??? And make it immediate and specific.
  4. It’s not what the actor feels; it’s what the audience feels as a result of what the actor does.
  5. Don’t settle into the character too quickly. Find the flexibility to be able to go with what the moment brings. (Or what they ask for - “Night and Day” as a serial killer? OK!*)
  6. Phrasing - find the operative words and phrases
  7. Cuts didn’t show anything. There should be a beginning, a middle and an end. 
  8. Commit to what you’re saying.The words can’t be a vehicle for your great sound. It has to be more than just that.
  9. The actor who listens on stage is the most interesting actor on stage. Not necessarily the one who is speaking.
I am so glad I did this post-certification workshop and Jeanie's seminar the next day (today) - which I'll write about tomorrow.

*David Chase DID ask a young man singing "Night and Day" to try it as a serial killer. It was weird - but it was effective. When the guy sang it straight the first time, it was not particularly impressive. When he sang it the second time, it had an edge to it - and I suddenly visualized him as Jud in Oklahoma! Now, I can't recommend someone should go in with that song in that style - but it might be an interesting exercise when you're working through various interpretations!

Saturday, July 20, 2013

Day 2 - Talkin' Shakespeare

So today's class covered:

  • Session II New information and experiential work connecting the technical trainings of actors, singers and dancers
Specifically, we began the day with Ashtanga-based yoga with sound. 

THAT WAS SO COOL. 

I have done yoga before, including a particularly annoying experience with Bikram yoga (there was a Groupon, and I don't mind heat) where the teacher made me feel totally uncomfortable because certain physical limitations (knees) kept me from being able to reach back and touch my heels while leaning backwards. I had pretty much decided that I simply couldn't do and didn't enjoy yoga.

Till today. As I mentioned yesterday, the experience of moving while making random sounds was incredibly liberating vocally. Sopranos who have never been comfortable in their lower registers suddenly found Mother Earth. Mezzos who have had issues getting through the upper passaggio (that would include me) were able to access whistle register pitches with no limitation. 

Today I experienced ease getting into poses that have been impossible for me before (although I still cannot reach my heels, but it didn't matter). Doing specific yoga poses while yelping and whooping and whimpering like a puppy felt organic in all aspects.

After our morning break, we watched a DVD of scientific research done by Dr. Melton showing the activation of the abdominal muscles in a variety of classical and non-classical styles. Again, IT WAS SO COOL. 

And in the afternoon, Dr. Melton passed out three Shakespearean sonnets and we discussed iambic pentameter, standard American practice for performing Shakespeare, and phrasing. Like yesterday, we stood in a circle and read the sonnets, although this time not playing and deconstructing the text, but rather going for the appropriate diction, shaping of the phrases, and using the language to convey the humanity of the characters.

When my love swears she is made of truth,
I do believe her, though I know she lies,
That she might think me some untutored youth
Unlearned in the world's false subtleties.
Thus vainly thinking that she thinks me young,
Although she knows my days are past the best,
Simply I credit her false-speaking tongue;
On both sides thus is simple truth suppressed.
But wherefore says she not she is unjust?
And wherefore say not I that I am old?
O love's best habit is in seeming trust,
And age in love loves not t'have years told;
    Therefore I lie with her, and she with me,
    And in our faults by lies we flattered be.
-- Sonnet #138, William Shakespeare

(Did I mention that it was SO COOL?)

Friday, July 19, 2013

Vocal Play and Deconstructing

Today was day 1 of my first post-certification course after taking Level III of Somatic Voicework™ the LoVetri Method in 2011. The course I chose to take was SPEAKING AND SINGING WITH THE SAME VOICE, taught by Joan Melton. Joan is a powerhouse - she is a pianist, a composer, a vocal coach, a voice scientist, an author, and an all-around force of nature. Everyone who has taken her course has raved about it, so I decided that I was going to do it. Even though I can ill afford it right now, with only two students through the end of July and my private studio not starting up till after Labor Day, I decided I could ill afford NOT to do it.

It's a three day workshop, and this is what we covered today.
  • Session I Foundational aspects of technique: Alignment, Breath Management, Range, Resonance, Articulation, and Connection, or the Acting dimension, as outlined in One Voice (Waveland 2012)
We launched right in to making sounds and movements coordinate. These were not necessarily pretty sounds or pretty movements - they just were. They were functional exercises to tap into how the breath works, how to explore range, how to find where sounds live in your mouth (a passion of mine), and feeling how those are manifested in the body. 

In the afternoon, we did an exercise that I found eye-opening. We took a poem and all of us were asked to walk around and speak the poem, all simultaneously, while walking around and exploring the important words and stresses in the poem. Then we came back and got in a circle. Each person took two lines of the poem and read them, exploring ways of interpreting the words and the text in a manner that didn't necessarily have to be "poetic" or even related to what the person before you had done. After that, we did it again, but this time with just one line.

We took words and deconstructed them, making sounds on each phoneme and physicalizing them, and then putting them together as a word, not necessarily interpreting the word but reveling in its individual sounds.

And it made me re-think a project I did in 2000. I sang on a program called Variety 2000: The Soul Turned Inside Out. Three hours of expressionism and surrealism. It included film, instrumental music, theater, vocal music, and adult puppet theater (!!!). The piece I sang was Yehuda Yannay's "Incantations," with a text by W.H. Auden.

The poem, from his collection The Age of Anxiety, was:

Lights are moving
on domed hills
Where little monks 
Get up in the dark.

Though wild volcanoes
Growl in their sleep
at a green world 
Inside their cloisters,

They sit, translating
A vision into
The vulgar lingo
Of armed cities

Where brides arrive
Through great doors
And robbers' bones
Dangle from gallows.

Yannay had completely deconstructed the text. The first line was set as follows (approximating here):

"Lights ... a ... a a a a a aaaaa .... aare ....mooooooooooooooooo .... ooo.... ooo ... ving" (interspersed with atonal punctuation from the piano). The remainder of the first stanza was set similarly.

The 2nd and 3rd stanzas were completely deconstructed and put into boxes on a page. Wherever your eye fell, that's what you sang. Sometimes it was with your hand over your mouth, or humming in the middle of a syllable, or yelling or whispering, or just being silent (the pianist had a similar page, requiring her to play inside the piano with mallets, fingers, slamming the keys). This is referred to as aleatory or chance music.

And then the final stanza was set similarly to the first. 

I got great reviews for this piece! (I was paid pretty well for it, too.) But I did not like the piece. I did not like that the poem had been shredded and the text serving Yannay's composition, rather than his composing serving the text. It was not something I had ever experienced, and until today, not something that I ever wanted to re-experience.

But now I want to go back and play with it. And find a way of interpreting it that might be personally rewarding for me (and hopefully an audience) instead of just fiscally and professionally rewarding. I'll need to find a pianist who wants to deconstruct and play with me as well (which I don't think will be a problem).

If you'd like to see what we did today, here's a video of Joan Melton in action in a similar workshop at the University of Michigan in 2010. 

I'll cover Day 2 tomorrow!

I've been mossified...

For the last few weeks, motivation has been missing from my life as far as getting my new residence in order, especially my new studio. Consequently, I have not been marketing myself as a teacher. Or a singer.

I blame some of it on this wrist injury, which I am pleased to announce will not require hand surgery. And part of it is just sloth. Which is not like me. I'm usually pretty engaged and hands on. But it's happened a few times before, and usually it precedes a period of intense productivity.

I feel like "if a rolling stone gathers no moss," I am but a large unwieldy boulder festooned with mossy growth.

Which sounds kind of gross and slimy, but then I found this picture and realized that moss isn't all that bad.

In fact, moss has a lot of uses, as I discovered. (You might call this research further procrastination and a distraction from the tasks I really need to accomplish, but bear with me for a moment.)

Sphagum moss is a component in peat, which is a fuel. It is also used for its healing properties, to grow things in, in smoking malt for whiskey (!), to put out fires, as insulation, and for crop improvement (i.e., fertilizer). Spanish moss is used as decoration.

Moss is a sign of fecundity. What is fecundity? It is

1. The quality or power of producing abundantly; fruitfulness or fertility.
2. Productive or creative power: fecundity of the mind.
(http://www.thefreedictionary.com/fecundity)

So, rather than disparaging myself for nesting or being slothful, I prefer to think of myself as fueling up for what I have to do, for healing myself (both the hand injury and other things we don't need to get into right now), to grow, possibly to put out fires (see "things we don't need to get into right now"), and to fertilize, so that I will produce abundantly and creatively.

And besides, while I always thought "a rolling stone gathers no moss" meant that someone who kept moving did not stagnate, the actual original meaning of the phrase was that a person in constant motion lacks roots and consequently does not cultivate new ideas, new experiences, new culture, new responsibilities.

I'm embracing all those things. Maybe not right now, but I will. 
(As soon as Mercury moves out of retrograde, which I think is tomorrow.) 


Saturday, July 6, 2013

Vulnerability and pretending not to care

From the twitter feed of Xstrology (online astrologer):

Gemini will pretend that they don't care at the times they are most vulnerable.

I'm a Gemini. I'm the quintessential Gemini - I talk a lot, I'm constantly doing 6 million and 12 things at once, I love change, I'm versatile - and on the downside, I find it difficult to stick to one thing at a time, I'm often indecisive, and sometimes I give the impression of being somewhat shallow.

And I often - too often - pretend that I don't care at the times I am most vulnerable.

In my personal life, this can result in my making jokes at inopportune times - I recall going to an emergency room for unexplained abdominal pain and making stupid jokes so that I wouldn't show that I was terrified. Consequently, the doctor didn't take me very seriously and thought I was wasting her time.

When my feelings are hurt or if I'm angry or frustrated, it's very easy for me to cry. But if I cry, then people might be uncomfortable or think I'm overreacting - so I make jokes or laugh. My husband says that he can always tell when I'm about to cry, because I start smiling really broadly. My speech becomes choppy and my movements a bit more abrupt.

And if I'm in a relationship that is coming to an end - whether it be romantic or a friendship - my defense is to become flippant, to become somewhat distant, and sometimes, I'm afraid, to be a little mean. As though I were saying, "Yeah, well, you didn't mean anything to me either, so go already. I won't miss you."

And in performing, specifically auditioning - for, after all, this blog is supposed to be about singing - I have found that I have occasionally done the same thing, especially with companies for whom I've auditioned in the past but who have not hired me, for whatever misguided reason. I don't get mean, per se, but I give off the attitude of, "Whatever. I don't really care. It's not like you're going to hire me anyway."

Consequently, my audition is unengaged and unengaging. And just like driving away someone I cared about because I was afraid of being rejected and thereby bringing the relationship to the end I expected, I fulfill the expectation that, in fact, they're not going to hire me.

What I need to do - and what all of us, as performers, need to do - is to stop making the audition about myself and about getting the gig. I need to make it about giving a performance that is genuine and authentic. It may or may not get me hired, but I have no control over that. I can control my performance, I can control how I relate to people, I can control my preparation.

As I mentioned in my blogpost on vulnerability and oversharing, vulnerability is "the core of shame and fear and our struggle for worthiness, but it appears that it's also the birthplace of joy, of creativity, of belonging, [and] of love." (Dr. Brené Brown)

Yes, allowing yourself to be vulnerable and then not hired (or dumped) can bring about the feelings of shame and fear and unworthiness, but being open to the possibilities and presenting yourself as open and genuine and accepting might just allow you to find that joy, that creativity, possibly belonging, and hopefully love. However you define love.

Which is a whole 'nother topic altogether. 

Monday, July 1, 2013

Vulnerability vs. Oversharing

Recently, I’ve been watching videos by psychologist BrenĂ© Brown on the topic of vulnerability. She has done extensive research on the advantages and disadvantages of making yourself vulnerable and allowing yourself to be authentic as a person.

What I love that Dr. Brown says about vulnerability is that it is "the core of shame and fear and our struggle for worthiness, but it appears that it's also the birthplace of joy, of creativity, of belonging, [and] of love." And also thinking about how people "surrender and walk into it."

Most of the times when we think about not being vulnerable in a performance, we think of being stiff and unexpressive. But there's another way that's even more egregious (in my opinion). And that is oversharing in performance.

I’ve been accused of oversharing - in my Facebook posts, in my personal interactions with people - and sometimes, my accusers are right. I  have given out too much information (hereafter TMI). Perhaps it wasn’t necessary to tweet about how cold the gel was on my body while lying on a table, waiting for an ultrasound.... 

And sometimes, I’m just being honest and it’s their problem that they can’t handle my honesty. I hope. 

So what’s the difference? When do you cross the line from opening up to others and being vulnerable into oversharing? I’ve been thinking about this as far as how it relates to performing. I strive to be an authentic performer, and to teach my students to find authenticity in their performances. 

I think the difference is intent. Vulnerability is a real expression of your feelings, telling a story, telling the truth.  It is an attempt to connect with your listener or your viewer and evoke a response that is also genuine. It is not an attempt to impress but to express. It is an attempt to resonate with your listener or viewer.

Oversharing is selfish. It is an attempt to evoke a response - of admiration, of pity, of concern, of outrage. You are putting something out there that is one-sided, not really looking for a dialogue or gaining an understanding, but just spewing it out to the world and damn the consequences. It may be truthful, but it’s not authentic. It is projecting rather than resonating. Which brings me to a vocal point:

Baritone Thomas Hampson was asked in a master class how he approached projection, and he said [paraphrasing somewhat]: “I don’t like to think of projection. It seems so one-directional. Bullets project. Missiles project. Small children thrown through plate glass windows project. But voices resonate.” 

Perhaps oversharing is the other side of the coin of being afraid to be vulnerable. It's a way of overcompensating.

Here's an example of vulnerability that I witnessed recently. In a recent recital, one of my students sang “Empty chairs at empty tables” from Les Miserables. He sang it beautifully. He was expressive, authentic, emotional, and he made people cry. He said to me a few months later, “Did you notice that I was crying?” and I told him that I didn’t, because it didn’t interfere with his singing and with his story. Often, singers and actors are told, “If you make the audience cry, you’ve done your job. If you cry, you just make the audience uncomfortable.” I generally agree with that - however, in his case, his emotion was so organic and genuine that it did not become uncomfortable. 

Then there's the quintessential demonstration of oversharing that I came across a few years ago, when I judged lower college musical theater women at NATS. A young woman came in and sang her three pieces:
  1. “Someone to watch over me,” Gershwin, Oh Kay! She decided to sing this while maintaining seductive eye contact with each of us judges. It was really uncomfortable.  And weird. She had two straight women and a gay man judging her and none of us were interested. The singing wasn’t particularly interesting - it was not as though she was coloring her voice or shaping the phrases to express a longing or a yearning - she was doing it all through contrived gestures and come-hither looks.
  2. “Honey bun,” Rodgers & Hammerstein, South Pacific. This involved a sailor hat. And interspersing her singing with shouting, “That’s mah little HONEY BUN!” Now, this song isn’t emotional - it’s a funny song. But the humor fell flat because it was inappropriate vocally and physically. And it depended on the use of a hat.
  3. And then the pièce de rĂ©sistance, “Your daddy’s son,” Ahrens & Flaherty, Ragtime. For this one, she grabbed a blanket and bundled it up to look like a baby. She sang the entire song to the bundle, but as she got more and more agitated - it is a very dramatic song - the bundle started getting out of control and had there been a real baby in the blanket, it would have suffered from shaken baby syndrome. And vocally, she went out of control as well. She began to scream, “Only ANGER AND PAIN, the BLOOD AND THE PAIN, I BURIED MY HEART IN THE GROUND - IN THE GROUND! WHEN I BURIED YOU IN THE GROUND.” The response it evoked from us was not, “That poor young woman, she feels so much grief and guilt,” but rather, “Oh my God, she’s going to have a vocal fold hemorrhage right here in front of us. Blood is going to start spurting out of her mouth.” And then it became funny. Unintentionally funny. On the final chorus, she burst into tears and could barely get the words out between sobs and when she got to the line, “You had your daddy’s hands - forgive me,” which is traditionally nearly whispered, she just screamed, “FORGIVE ME!” and I had to put my hands over my mouth so that I wouldn’t openly laugh.
It was the worst performance I’d ever seen at NATS. Or pretty much anywhere, for that matter. Worse than someone standing and doing nothing. It was not an authentic performance. It reeked of, “Look what I can do! I can be sexy, I can be funny, I can break your heart - just watch me!” What she should have been saying was: “I’m lonely and need someone to love me,” “I’m in love with a real peach of a gal - let me tell you about her,” and finally, “I hate myself for what I did, and I have no excuses - except this.”

She did not resonate with her audience. She projected her emotions - more like projectile vomited her emotions all over us. And like projectile vomit, we couldn’t wait to wash it off. (Was that too much? Probably.)

Tell a story. Tell the truth. It’s not about you as a singer/actor, it’s about the story that you have to tell. What is the core truth of it? What can telling this story offer your audience? What can it offer you as the storyteller? 


Don’t hold back. Give your audience as much as you can, but make it real. Tell the truth.  Be real. Invest yourself fully and not on a superficial level of “watch ME!” or “listen to ME,” but “hear my story.”


Only the names have been changed ...

"The story you’re about to watch is true, only the names have been changed to protect the innocent...."

That line used to open the old TV show, Dragnet. It’s been running through my head lately as I’ve contemplated how to start myself anew in Baltimore, after 17 years (!!!) in Milwaukee.

When I left Milwaukee the first time, I was married to my first husband, and went by the name of Christine Thomas. I loved that name. If I’m honest with myself, marrying Whatshisname Thomas had a lot to do with the fact that I hated my birth name, Christine Bojic. It was a name that was said with a sneer when I was a fat, awkward child and preteen, and was associated with a very painful part of my childhood. I dreamt of being a writer and taking on a pen name, something French sounding like Michelle Monteau. (I also liked alliteration.) There was no question that when I married, I would take my husband’s name - at least as long as it wasn’t worse than “Bojic.” (There are a few names that are - Anthony Weiner, for one.)

I was Christine Thomas for a long time and when we divorced, there was no question of my taking back my birth name. I had 1000 headshots that said, “Christine Thomas, Mezzo-Soprano” across the bottom of them. What was I supposed to do???? Besides, I had already done roles in Milwaukee and Washington as Christine Thomas. That’s how people knew me. And it was a great professional name. It was strong and confident sounding, and not more than a little WASP-y sounding, which for this Estonian/Slovenian First Generation American was extremely appealing.

And besides, a lot of people kept their first husband’s names when they made their careers. Susan Sarandon was married to Chris Sarandon briefly in the 70s. Demi Moore, married to musician Freddy Moore. And since I never intended to remarry, it was okay.

But I did remarry, much to my surprise. And I wasn’t sure if it was okay to keep using my first husband’s name if I was married to someone else. Bill said he didn’t mind, but I didn’t know. Then I ran into my ex-sister-in-law’s best friend, who informed me that Whosis was back living in Wisconsin with his parents. And that he wasn’t doing very well. 

At that point, the decision was made for me. If I’d kept his name, he would probably see it as a sign that I wanted him back. And with him in the same metropolitan area? No thank you.

Most of you know that my performing career pretty much dried up in 2004, after doing the second production of A Cudahy Caroler’s Christmas. Those two seasons, playing Wanda Kazlakowski, mark the only stage work I did as Christine O’Meally. I did some concert work, but not a lot. All my major credits were as Christine Thomas. And that is how people know me.

A couple of years after my remarriage, I ran into someone who said, “Chris - you’re still here? I thought you’d moved!” And I always wondered - did my name change work against me? Did people stop seeing Christine Thomas in print and wrote me off as having left the area? 

So after talking it over with my husband, I’ve decided to reclaim Christine Thomas as my professional name - as a performer. As a teacher, I’m probably better known as Christine O’Meally, and a lot of people know me by that name because of my membership in NATS, as a Somatic Voicework™ teacher, and as an active contributor to national and international vocal discussion groups. So I’m going to hyphenate for teaching purposes -  at least for now - and be Christine Thomas-O’Meally.

This does not mean a change in my marital status. I am still legally Christine O’Meally and will probably stay that way unless I find it causes financial confusion. 

I’m really excited about reclaiming the identity that I had during the time that I identified myself as primarily a performing artist. I feel like I’m taking back my power (if not my innocence.)

What’s in a name? Everything. 



Christine Thomas

I'm gonna like the way that looks.

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Finding my Audition Mindset

Today I went to audition for Opera AACC (Anne Arundel Community College). They are doing two shows for which I would be perfect - Carmen (as the title character or as Mercedes - except they weren't casting that role) and Amahl & the Night Visitors (as Mother).

It went okay. I sang "Seguidilla" from Carmen. I would've liked to have sung "All that gold" from Amahl, but I just got my music books delivered on Thursday, didn't find the music till my nephew Nick unpacked it for me on Sunday, and I just didn't feel like it was perfect. "Seguidilla" wasn't perfect - my first run was a little sloppy, for some reason. And I tripped over some French.

But I sang well, and I sang expressively, I think.

The hardest thing for me is getting into the same level of intensity and engagement in my auditioning that I have in my teaching and in my performing. And part of it is armor that I've put on over the past few years. It's the "Well, you're not going to hire me anyway, so why should I put myself out there for you?" armor that I've developed after numerous auditions for Milwaukee companies over the last ten years. Which then becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. I'm not giving it my all and therefore, I'm not getting hired. And then I wound up not even auditioning because I didn't want to give a mediocre audition and not get hired, and I didn't want to give a terrific audition - and still not get hired.

What I have to remember is that I have no control over getting hired. I only can control the quality of my audition.

In this blog article, the author identifies two specific kinds of mindsets:

1. The worry-induced mindset, which "creates a condition in which the auditioners will actually begin to worry about them."

and

2. The self-possessed mindset: "The self-possessed mindset is a fiercely independent spirit that creates the metaphorical space for an actor to do their audition the way they want to do it, without needing anything from the auditioner."

I don't know if my negative mindset exactly met the definition of #1. I think it was more of a "I don't care if you like me or not and in fact I know you're not going to, so I'm not going to do anything to change your mind." I know I've sat through worry-induced mindsets as an adjudicator, and I know I've given some worry-inducing auditions when I was a very young singer.

But I need to find the self-possessed mindset and I need to do it now. There is no reason why I cannot give that audition. I am a fiercely independent spirit. I don't need anything from the auditioner. I don't need permission. 

Friday, May 24, 2013

Chrissie has left the building....

After 15 years, last week I closed the Milwaukee version of my private studio, packed everything up and loaded an incredibly long moving van full of my stuff (as well as one very full Subaru wagon) and moved to Baltimore. That's where I'm sitting right now, in my Baltimore living room writing this while my husband plays Supertramp on his brand new upright.  My furniture isn't here yet - the movers won't arrive till next Tuesday or Wednesday, so I'm kind of in limbo.

My new in-house studio space is also empty - not only of furniture, but of students as well. I will need to start marketing myself sometime this summer. I've joined Maryland NATS, I might have a job lined up at a local community college, and I'll be putting out the word at my alma mater, Peabody, that I'll be ready to go after Labor Day. My summer project will be writing an article about the process of uprooting a successful studio and starting all over for the Journal of Singing (my due date is 10/2013, so keep me honest - ask me how it's going!).

At this time last year, there was nothing more I wanted than to return to the east coast, to a place where I was appreciated as a performer. I didn't start teaching until I'd been back in Milwaukee for about a year. Teaching voice was just supposed to be something I did so I didn’t have to work in an office between gigs. I didn’t know I’d be good at it. I didn’t know I would be passionate about it. I didn’t know that I would actually pass up gigs because I’d rather teach. (Not good gigs, mind you - but there was a time when I’d take any gig just to have a gig.)

Now I want to have it all. I want to perform, and I want to teach. This is a good move for me, I know that. But at the same time, I look at the picture of this empty room where so many people made beautiful music - and the room is not all that's empty. I may fill the empty place in my heart with new students, but the ones I leave behind are the ones who made my heart sing. Not only aloud, but inside. 

Thank you all. 

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Feeling like me

Sometimes people come into your life who make you feel more like yourself than you have for a long time. Maybe they don't stay around for very long, but long enough for you to remember who you are and what you want for yourself. And what you are no longer willing to accept.

I've had six months of being on my own sans husband and dogs. At first, I was terribly lonely and awake much of the night, troubled by the quiet house and my own monkey mind (which is a Buddhist term meaning "unsettled; restless; capricious; whimsical; fanciful; inconstant; confused; indecisive; uncontrollable;" I visualize my mind as possessing a small Capuchin monkey running around and wildly flinging feces). But as time has gone on, I've welcomed solitude, probably for the first time ever. And I have to say, I'm more than a little apprehensive of losing it. What is it going to be like to live with someone again?

My students have been my primary focus in the past few months, especially as we worked together on this past Sunday's studio recital. I've gotten to know a few people particularly well, and I've found a new level of creative stimulation that I haven't had as part of my life for a very long time. Ideas coming and going, from myself and others, thoughts on where a scene should go, where a career should go, and where life should go. It's been exhilarating.

It makes me feel like - me. It's not a last desperate grasping for youth; it's a feeling of being vibrant, alive, full of possibilities. Maybe that is a feeling associated with youth, but I don't believe it's limited to a particular age group, and I want to hold on to it and keep building on it. It's the way I felt when I left Baltimore, and it's the way I feel now as I return.

Who am I? I am a singer. I am a voice teacher. I am damn good at both. I want to do both for as long as I can.

What do I want? I want a thriving studio like I had here in Milwaukee with students who absorb information like a sponge. I want to perform again. I want to have the opportunity to take these programming skills I have developed to another level and maybe do some more directing. I'd love to take the scenes showcase and turn it into a separate entity that has its own set of regularly scheduled rehearsals instead of just one frenetic weekend. (Although we've accomplished a lot with one frenetic weekend, if I do say so myself.)

What I'm not willing to accept? Feeling less than vibrant, less than creative, feeling limited. Walking on eggshells. Not being respected. I won't take that from anyone, not in any situation. 

I feel like me again and me is pretty awesome. (Correction: Me am pretty awesome.)

Sunday, March 31, 2013

There's been a change of heart

This morning, I sang for an Easter service for the first time since I left St. Paul's Episcopal Church in 2008. I'm used to singing at Episcopal and Christian Science churches, where the repertoire tends to be very traditional. And even though I'm not currently subscribing to any particular faith (does our Lady Queen of Brunch count? what about Zumbafarian?), I am a traditionalist in terms of worship music. I love to sing and listen to plainchant, Renaissance motets, Bach Cantatas, Mozart Masses, bombastic late Romantic Anglican anthems, and the like.

So when I was asked to sing at a Unity Church in Elm Grove, and to sing contemporary Christian music, I had second thoughts. And then I was told the fee was $100 and those went out the window.

When I received the music, I groaned. And then I sang it, and I shrieked. As a snobbish liberal elitist and conservatory trained opera singer, singing New Age-y rep like "Was it a morning like this?" and the over-the-top, constantly modulating and mawkish "They could not" set my teeth on edge. And "The Prayer" (sung by Josh Groban and Celine Dion) could not be cheesier and more "popera"-ish.

Two things happened to change my mind.

The first was that I had a rehearsal on Thursday with the keyboard player, bassist and the tenor soloist. The keyboard player was George Busateri, who has been a force in Milwaukee music for decades. The bass player was Duane Stuermer, who has played with Sweetbottom and other well-known bands in the area (and is Genesis guitarist Daryl Stuermer's brother). The tenor I knew - Stuart Mitchell, with whom I've sung several times and who got me the gig in the first place. He's a great singer and he knows the style so well, despite the fact that he is also an elitist opera singer. :)

They were fantastic. The rehearsal was a joy. I had a great time singing bad music. Who'da thunk it?

The second thing happened this morning, in the service itself. I saw how much this music meant to the congregation. It moved them, it touched them, it spoke to them. So I went with it. Even though it's not my preferred choice of worship expression, I decided to play the role of a contemporary Christian performer and give them what they needed. Their response was so positive that it made me give more. And it wasn't artificial or contrived. I was truly in the moment, expressing the meaning behind the text. It was a rush. I got a standing ovation after "They could not" (a song described by both Matt Bender and Kelsee York in their lessons as "the worst song I've ever heard"). People wept. I've never had the experience in a church setting before. At least not to that extent.

I don't tell this to say, "Look how great I am - I made people cry - I got a standing ovation!" I haven't changed my mind about contemporary Christian music. I'm not going to go join a praise band (shudder). But it was a huge discovery for me - and one that I think I can take to my future sacred and secular performances. 

When you give, you get. And then you give more. And then you get more. And it's a joy. And that's why we do what we do. And I hope I get to do more of it!

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

It's not all about the breath...

Breathing is important. There's no question about that.

But not every vocal issue is resolved by "getting the breath under it," "singing on the breath," or "just support more."

Some things are resonance based, registration based, a question of constriction. 

No, you can't be resonant if your breath support is inconsistent, whether you are breathy or pressed. 

And registration can depend on that also.

But maybe your breath support is just fine but your tongue is pulled back. Or you're nasal.  Or your articulation is not as efficient as it could be.  Or maybe you're carrying up too much weight and not allowing your voice to transition as needed. 

So it could be alignment. Or articulation. Or registration.

And you're trying so hard to "support support support" that all the other factors are going out the window. 

When I was a very young teacher, that's all I knew. "Support! That will fix everything."

Maybe it is support - but maybe you can't fix it until you fix your alignment, your articulation, your registration issues. Or maybe the key to fixing it is fixing one of those things. 
  • You fix your physical alignment and your breath can flow more easily
  • You fix your retracted tongue and your vocal folds can respond more effectively to your breath energy
  • You find a lighter mechanism and your breath doesn't have to work as hard.
What I'm saying is that there are many roads to the same destination. The destination is efficient and functional singing. How do we get there? We can't all take the same road. Maybe you need to take the scenic route. Maybe the shortest path between two points, if that works for you. 

Jeanie LoVetri says sometimes we have to wait for the bus. Maybe it's a direct route, maybe non-stop. 

Sunday, February 17, 2013

Jeff Costello's Blog: Concentration and Focus

Jeff Costello's Blog: Concentration and Focus: OK, would you like to really know what I teach? I teach concentration.  And, Focus. That's really about it.  It doesn't take a ton of Go...

It's a grand n̶i̶g̶h̶t̶ day for singing!!!

Tomorrow, February 17, will be my penultimate studio recital. It is the pre-WSMA recital, although in this case, we are also featuring performers preparing for musical auditions, the Auditions Plus/Classical Singer audition, and the Greendale Community Theatre production of Les Miserables.

There are 19 people performing tomorrow - we are opening with Rodgers' "It's a grand night for singing" (but it's only 2:30, hence the title) and closing with Gershwin's "My cousin in Milwaukee." Both will be sung by my two youngest students. In between, we will hear from five boys (the most I've had for a number of years, which is how I can tell the economy is getting better - boys are taking lessons again!) and 12 other girls. The repertoire will range from musical theater to operetta to opera, and we'll even do a little bit of ensemble work as a preview of the final recital, which will be held on May 12.

The recital will be held at 2:30pm at St. John's on the Lake. Admission is free.

Speaking of the final recital, I'll need to know by 2/28 who is participating. I plan to coordinate the program during my break (3/1-3/10) and distribute music the week of 3/11.

Toi toi toi everyone. (I never say "break a leg," especially this time of year - there's ice out there!)

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

My Lenten Resolution/Your Lenten Challenge

I grew up Catholic, but with a non-Catholic mother. And although she had to swear that she would raise her children Catholic when she married my very Catholic father, she found ways to get around that. The whole idea of Lenten sacrifice was something that she really couldn't wrap her head around. She never sacrificed anything if it didn't suit her or if she couldn't use it to make herself look good (I know that sounds harsh, but I'm being honest). No meat on Fridays? She didn't like fish and her attitude was, "God doesn't want us to go hungry." Same thing for fasting - perhaps it was having lived through depression and war, but the idea of going without food by choice was anathema to her. 

So giving up things was not something I was raised with. I don't recall my dad participating in that either (then again, Mom did all the cooking and dad didn't like fish or vegetables any more than she did, so if he didn't want to starve, he had to eat what she put in front of him).

In the years since my childhood, I've made a concerted effort to give things up. If not for religious reasons, at least to try to break habits for a limited time which would hopefully become long-term. Or to lose weight. Or to be more productive. I've given up french fries, I've given up Bejeweled, I've given up fast food - and it's always a short-term fix.

So this year, I'm going to try to establish some new habits instead.
  1. I'm going to practice every day. Mindfully and with purpose. My plan is to put together my audition repertoire for my return to Baltimore - to include operetta, opera, oratorio, musical theater and cabaret. I've already started that. It's hard to practice when you have 40 students between two schools (home and Stritch), but I have to do it. Even if I don't have time to practice a bunch of songs at one sitting, at least I can vocalize and do something.
  2. I'm going to write. This doesn't mean 40 days of blogs. I don't know what I'm going to write, but I'm going to write something. I have an article to write for the Journal of Singing on the process of leaving a successful voice studio behind and re-establishing my studio in a new city. (Actually, two articles - one in a year from now to document my progress.) I want to get into the practice of regular writing. Before I wanted to be a singer, I wanted to be a writer. 
What I'm not going to do is give up Bejeweled or french fries or fast food or vow to exercise every day. I'm going to keep up with my wheat elimination program, following the principles of the book Wheat Belly, because it seems to make me feel better. And I'm going to continue to try to eat at home and not spend money eating out - but I'm doing that anyway. I'll try to keep up those things because they're working for me. 

What singing goals can you set for yourself for the next 40 days? Here are some suggestions:
  1. Practice mindfully. Every day. (You can have Sundays off.)
  2. Learn the International Phonetic Alphabet to help you with your foreign language singing.
  3. Look into a summer training program. First Stage? Some music camp?
  4. Sing in a different language.
  5. Improve your piano skills so you can learn music faster.
  6. Listen to some singers in a different genre than you usually listen to.
  7. Audition for a show!
Maybe God doesn't want me to starve, but He does want me to sing. Of that I'm sure. 

Sunday, January 27, 2013

The Incredibly True Story of How I Pissed Off Robert Goulet's Widow

I blame one of my Facebook friends, I really do. She posted the video - I viewed it and I told myself, "Don't read the comments, don't read them - it's like reading comments in the news. You'll just get in trouble." Well. I did.

As most of my friends know, Julie Andrews is why I'm a singer. So when I see her doing something that is, at least by contemporary standards, wildly inappropriate, I cringe. So when I saw a video of her singing "Porgy, I's your woman now" with Robert Goulet (another childhood favorite), all I could think was "facepalm." It is sung beautifully. How could it not be? But there are several things about it that are just wrong.

  1. The opera is written specifically for African-Americans. The Gershwin estate forbids productions of the opera from casting non-African-Americans.
  2. Julie Andrews and Robert Goulet are the two whitest people on the face of the earth.
  3. I really have trouble with white people singing black dialect. I even have trouble with black people singing black dialect if it sounds contrived. In other words, if it's too self-consciously done. 
  4. Julie Andrews is the queen of English diction. Proper British diction. It's why I fell in love with her in Mary Poppins and Sound of Music. Not only is she the whitest person in the world, she is the most British. Not only is Porgy and Bess African-American, it's African-American
  5. While many songs from P&B are standards - "Summertime," "I got plenty of nuttin'", "It ain't necessarily so," - "Porgy, I's your woman now" is not. It is show-specific. 
  6. Even if this was part of a Gershwin tribute, there are other duets that could've worked.
So I intended to watch the video, maybe repost it, and that'd be the end of it. And then I decided to see what other people thought.

And someone said [paraphrasing], "Wow, that's amazing. Can you imagine if they'd done that together on Broadway?"

I couldn't help it. I felt compelled to educate (yeah, I know, no one asked me). "Are you kidding? Do you not know that this is an African-American opera? They couldn't do this on Broadway. In fact, this duet probably should never have happened."

As soon as I hit send, I knew that last line shouldn't have been written.

A few hours later, I had an email that said, "Vera Goulet has responded to your post."

Uh-oh.

Did she ever. In fact, even though my post was in response specifically to the idea of their being in that show on Broadway, and to a lesser extent about the inappropriateness of the duet, Mrs. Goulet took it personally. And let me have it. Also personally.

She wrote approximately 20 posts over the space of 12 hours about how vane [sic], ignorant, stupid and arrogant I was. And how she assumed I was a failed frustrated wannabe singer/actress and, after Googling me, that she was right in that assumption. I was nothing more than a vocal coach in Wauwatosa, Wisconsin. I was as far from Broadway as I could be. I was a nothing and a nobody. In listening to my singing on my website, Julie Andrews had nothing to worry about. (Did I say she did???) And I was not going to destroy her husband's legacy. (Did I say I wanted to???)

I tried to apologize and to make clear that I loved both of them as artists and that the piece was sung beautifully, but that I did not like the piece. It was not to be accepted. 

I also made it clear that while I apologized for the comment, I did not apologize for my profession. I am a voice teacher. I am proud to be a voice teacher. I love my job and it is my passion.

Mrs. Goulet's response was that I gave myself too much credit. Then other people started posting insults - one of which said, "If you know so much, why haven't we ever heard of you? When was your last world tour? When did you sing a command performance for the Queen of England?"

At that point, I decided to delete all of my posts because I simply did not want to have any more emails from strangers attacking me. I won't even look at the comments to see if anyone else has attacked or even defended me.

And the thing I feel the worst about is that people misunderstood my opinion as my disliking either of the artists. The times were different. I'm sure if I saw it back in the early 70s (guessing the time based on Goulet's sideburns), I would've loved it back then. I'm basing my opinion on what I know now.

While I was shocked at the vehemence of the Widow Goulet's attack, and the personal nature of it, after doing a little Googling of my own, I found that I am not the first person to feel her wrath.

It sounds like she adored her husband and he adored her. The part in the article about him taking care of her after she wrecked his car in a terrible accident and had to go through massive reconstruction surgery - it touched me. I'm sure she feels his loss keenly and I respect that. I'm sorry that I offended her and that she took it so personally.

But I reiterate - I am proud of my profession. This is my passion. It may have begun as something to do between singing gigs, but this is who I am now and I could not be happier with the direction my life has taken.